<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for In The Image</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intheimage.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intheimage.com</link>
	<description>We’re a skilled team of creative, marketing professionals specializing in comprehensive total branding solutions. Our goal is to empower businesses and organizations to communicate their vision, create brand consistency, and connect with people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Branded House vs. House of Brands vs. House Blend by Adam</title>
		<link>http://intheimage.com/blog/branding/branded-house-vs-house-of-brands-vs-house-blend/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intheimage.com/blog/?p=41#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Good question, Murray. I think a Blended House is a great possibility. However, it&#039;s imperative that ANY brand start off with a Branded House mentality. Building a single brand to maturity is much easier than developing a family of brands. After the single brand is stable, it&#039;s a viable option to develop an addition brand within that brand (aka. Blended House). Just make sure that your primary brand is very well established and will not be negatively affected by the second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, Murray. I think a Blended House is a great possibility. However, it&#8217;s imperative that ANY brand start off with a Branded House mentality. Building a single brand to maturity is much easier than developing a family of brands. After the single brand is stable, it&#8217;s a viable option to develop an addition brand within that brand (aka. Blended House). Just make sure that your primary brand is very well established and will not be negatively affected by the second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Branded House vs. House of Brands vs. House Blend by Murray</title>
		<link>http://intheimage.com/blog/branding/branded-house-vs-house-of-brands-vs-house-blend/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intheimage.com/blog/?p=41#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam, is it possible for an organization to have both a branded house and a house of brands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam, is it possible for an organization to have both a branded house and a house of brands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What we have here is a failure to communicate&#8230; by Michelle Ziner</title>
		<link>http://intheimage.com/blog/communication/what-we-have-here-is-a-failure-to-communicate/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Ziner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intheimage.com/blog/?p=99#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Adam,
Great message! It&#039;s amazing how the brightest and most complex thinkers have such a hard time crystallizing thoughts! I will certainly remember this when trying to communicate an idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,<br />
Great message! It&#8217;s amazing how the brightest and most complex thinkers have such a hard time crystallizing thoughts! I will certainly remember this when trying to communicate an idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

