<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Branded House vs. House of Brands vs. House Blend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intheimage.com/blog/branding/branded-house-vs-house-of-brands-vs-house-blend/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intheimage.com/blog/branding/branded-house-vs-house-of-brands-vs-house-blend</link>
	<description>We’re a skilled team of creative, marketing professionals specializing in comprehensive total branding solutions. Our goal is to empower businesses and organizations to communicate their vision, create brand consistency, and connect with people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://intheimage.com/blog/branding/branded-house-vs-house-of-brands-vs-house-blend/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intheimage.com/blog/?p=41#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Good question, Murray. I think a Blended House is a great possibility. However, it&#039;s imperative that ANY brand start off with a Branded House mentality. Building a single brand to maturity is much easier than developing a family of brands. After the single brand is stable, it&#039;s a viable option to develop an addition brand within that brand (aka. Blended House). Just make sure that your primary brand is very well established and will not be negatively affected by the second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, Murray. I think a Blended House is a great possibility. However, it&#8217;s imperative that ANY brand start off with a Branded House mentality. Building a single brand to maturity is much easier than developing a family of brands. After the single brand is stable, it&#8217;s a viable option to develop an addition brand within that brand (aka. Blended House). Just make sure that your primary brand is very well established and will not be negatively affected by the second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://intheimage.com/blog/branding/branded-house-vs-house-of-brands-vs-house-blend/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intheimage.com/blog/?p=41#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam, is it possible for an organization to have both a branded house and a house of brands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam, is it possible for an organization to have both a branded house and a house of brands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

